High CourtsDivision Bench(2001) 09 BOM CK 0021

Shafi Ahmed Sayyed Mohammed Guse Kadri vs Union of India (UOI) and Another

Bombay High Court · Decided on 21 September 2001 · Citation: (2002) 2 LLJ 252

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.P. Singh, C.J · D.Y. Chandrachud, J
CASE NUMBER
A.S.W.P. No. 474 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 247 words
1.

The Respondent-Management terminated the services of the Petitioner on December 13, 1991. It appears that a dispute was raised by the Petitioner for the first time on June 30, 2000. By the impugned order dated November 10, 2000, Exhibit ''E'' page 23, the Government of India has refused to refer the matter for adjudication under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in view of the fact that a dispute has been raised belatedly after the lapse of 9 years without any valid reason.

2.

The ground on which the Government of India has refused to refer the dispute for adjudication, does not appear to be valid in view of the settled law. We only refer the judgment Gurmail Singh Vs. Principal, Govt. College of Education and Others, which refers to the earlier authorities. It has been laid down that if the dispute persists despite passage of time, the dispute exists and, therefore, must be adjudicated upon. In case of delay, the only question would be, the manner in which the relief would be molded particularly in so far as it relates to back wages for the period of delay.

3.

We set aside the impugned order of the Government of India and remit the matter to Government of India to pass fresh order in accordance with law. The Government of India must pass final order within a period of one month from the date on which a copy of this order is communicated or received by it.