High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 10 DEL CK 4100

Shabeer Ahmad Bhat vs Sushil Kumar Pathak

Delhi High Court · Decided on 31 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 453/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 219 words
1.

The dispute between the parties stands settled vide Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 4 September 2023.

2.

The designation of the parties in the MoU is as under:

NameParty No.
Shabeer Ahmad Bhat1
Mrs. Shameema Bano2
Mr. Asif Ali Mirza3
Mr. Altaf Hussain Gado4
Ms. Shaheena Akhtar5
Mrs. Rama Rani Pathak, Mr. Shubham Pathak and Mr. Rishabh Pathak (all legal heirs of late Dr. Sushil Kumar Pathak).6
Mrs. Rama Rani Pathak7
Ms. Neha Sharma8
Ms. Shweta Sharma9
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma10
Mr. Sanjay Chaudhary11
Mr. Rishabh Pathak12
Mr. Shubham Pathak13
Mr. Umesh Gaur14
3.

Clause 4 (e) of the MoU records the undertaking of parties 6 to 14 to assign the trademarks which had been registered in the name of Sushil Kumar Pathak, the husband of Party No. 7, in favour of Globiotech International by 31 December 2023, on payment being made by parties 1 to 5 in terms of the MoU.

4.

Learned Counsel for the parties are represented and they undertake on behalf of the respective clients to remain bound by the aforesaid MoU and the terms contained therein.

5.

As such, the dispute in the present petition does not survive for consideration.

6.

The petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid MoU particularly para 4(e) thereof, by which the parties shall remain bound.