Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 02 ITAT CK 4021

Sh. Virender Yadav vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 17 February 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.4042/Del/2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 405 words

PER C.N. PRASAD, JM,

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Gurgaon dated 14.05.2015 for A.Y. 2009-10.

2.

The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal :-

1.

That The Ld. CIT(A)-I, Gurgaon has erred in law & on facts while rejecting the appeal of Assessee without appreciating the facts & material placed on record during the Assessment and arbitrarily held disallowance of 70% of total expense as made by the Ld AO without any basis.

2.

The Ld CIT(A) has erred in law & on facts in not affording reasonable opportunity to explain the Special facts & circumstances of case & has grossly violated the principles of Natural Justice, and on this ground alone the impugned order is liable to be quashed.

3.

That The Ld CIT(A)-I, Gurgaon has erred in law & on facts while upholding addition of Rs. 7,85,000/- on a/c cash credit despite of fact of confirmation, was placed on record.

4.

That The Ld CIT(A)-1, Gurgaon has erred in law & on facts while summarily rejecting the contention & material placed on record before him, and had also arbitrarily rejected the additional evidences filed u/r 46A of IT. Act.

5.

That the Ld. CIT(A)-I, Gurgaon has erred in law & on facts while mechanically passing the order, upholding the entire disallowance & additions of The Ld. AO in the order passed u/s.143(3) of I.T. Act. The whole order is based on arbitrariness & there is no application of judicious mind or even appreciation of existing material placed on record.

3.

Inspite of issue of notice none appeared on behalf of assessee nor any adjournment application was moved. The appeal is disposed of on hearing the Ld. DR.

4.

On perusal of the grounds of appeal and the order of the Ld.CIT(A) it is observed that the Ld. CIT(A) did not admit the additional evidences furnished by the assessee. It is noticed that there is not even a discussion in the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on the additional evidences furnished by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A). Therefore, taking the totality of the facts and circumstances into consideration, I feel it appropriate to restore the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) who shall decide the issue afresh after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.