High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 DEL CK 3826

Sh. Rajender Singh & Anr. vs The State Of NCT Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Girish Kathpalia, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 5968/2026, CRL.M.A. 24876/2026 & CRL.M.A. 24875/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 279 words
1.

Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 407/2019 of Police Station Dwarka South, District Dwarka, Delhi for offence under Section 174A IPC.

2.

It is contended on behalf of petitioners that the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed because as per law, FIR under Section 174 IPC can be registered only on the directions of the magistrate, whereas in the present case it was registered on the complaint of daughter-in-law of petitioners (the present respondent no. 2), who is working as a police official.

3.

But at the outset, learned APP for State assisted by IO/SI Amit Kumar, points out that the petition is not maintainable because the petitioners do not have locus standi to file this petition, as the petitioners are not the person accused in the impugned FIR.

4.

On being called upon to address on locus standi of petitioners, it is submitted by learned counsel that petitioners are receiving notices from IO to join investigation. But in this regard, learned APP for State points out that earlier, petitioners had challenged even those notices by way of Crl. M.C. 3409/2026, which petition was disposed of on 05.05.2026 by a co-ordinate bench on the submission of learned counsel for petitioners that they are ready and willing to join investigation and participate therein; and accordingly, that petition was withdrawn by the petitioners.

5.

On being called upon to address further as regards maintainability of this petition, learned counsel for petitioners submits that appropriate orders may be passed.

6.

Accordingly, in view of order dated 05.05.2026 of the co-ordinate bench, coupled with the lack of locus standi of petitioners, the present petition and the accompanying applications are dismissed.