Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 02 ITAT CK 3460

Sh. Nitin Gupta vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 9 February 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, J
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.155/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 193 words

ORDER

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1083176385(1), dated 01.12.2025 involving proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

It emerges during the course of hearing that both the learned authorities have treated the assessee’s purchase amount in immovable property in question to the tune of Rs.12.19 lakhs as unexplained under section 69A of the Act; in assessment order dated 05.07.2021 as upheld in the lower appellate discussion.

3.

That being the case, this tribunal hereby notices from a perusal of the case records that the assessee had in fact received a sum of Rs.11.50 lakhs via banking channel from his mother Smt. Renu Gupta. It is made clear that this clinching fact has gone unrebutted from the Revenue side regarding the source of the assessee’s mother cash in hand which could not have been treated as an unexplained. The impugned addition is directed to be deleted in very terms therefore.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.