Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 04 ITAT CK 3204

Sh. Dharmender Saini vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 27 April 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member · Naveen Chandra, Accountant Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.7778/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 200 words

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012-13, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1081828555(1), dated 16.10.2025 involving proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

2.

It emerges during the course of hearing that both the lower authorities herein have held the assessee to have concealed as well as furnished inaccurate particulars of his taxable income. The Assessing Officer’s vide order dated 24.12.2024 levied the impugned section 271(1)(c) penalty of Rs.4,81,010/- which has been upheld in the lower appellate discussion.

3.

It further transpires during the course of hearing that the Tribunal had already restored the assessee’s quantum appeal ITA No.3872/Del/2023 back to the CIT(A) for afresh appropriate adjudication which is stated to be still pending. That being the clinching factual position, we are of the considered view that the assessee’s instant penalty appeal also deserves to follow suit in very terms being consequential in nature. Ordered accordingly. All other remaining issues are left open at this stage.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.