High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 09 DEL CK 1892

Sh. Amit Kumar & Ors. vs The State Of Nct Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 5 September 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 6968/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 400 words

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

1.

Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 0570/2022, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Sagar Pur and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies on 09.12.2020. No child was born out of the wedlock. Due to matrimonial differences, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 16.08.2022.

4.

The disputes are stated to have been initially settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Deed dated 13.01.2023. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 13.05.2024.

5.

Respondent No. 2, who is present in person along with her counsel, submits that she has no further grievance in this regard and has no objection to quashing of FIR in terms of settlement between the parties.

6.

Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7.

Petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Vinod Kapoor, PS: Sagar Pur. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion.

8.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. The chances of conviction are bleak in view of amicable settlement between the parties. Consequently, FIR No. 0570/2022, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Sagar Pur and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.