Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1997) 04 SC CK 0099

Sewa Ram and others vs Union of India and others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 1 April 1997 · Citation: AIR 1997 SC 2620 : (1997) AIRSCW 2578 : (1997) 4 JT 692 : (1997) 3 SCALE 506 : (1997) 5 SCC 166 : (1997) 3 SCR 490 : (1997) 4 Supreme 701

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Ramaswamy, J · D. P. Wadhwa, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 2746 of 1980

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 276 words

K. Ramaswamy and D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.—This appeal by special leave arises from the order dated 31.7.1979 of the High Court of Allahabad made in Civil Revision No. 84 of 1978.

2.

The admitted position is that one Mohd. Marghoob Siddiqui had migrated to Pakistan prior to August 14, 1947 and became a citizen of Pakistan. His mother Kabool Fatima who remained in India died on August 7, 1965. Subsequently, he came to India and appears to have obtained the Bhumidari rights of his mother and sold the property to the appellants. The respondents had initiated proceedings against the property on the ground that Mohd. Marghoob Siddiqui was an enemy and therefore, the Enemy Property Act, 1968 (Act No. 34 of 1968) was applicable. The appellants claimed title to the property. Subsequent thereto, the appellants filed a suit for injunction to restrain the respondents from taking possession of the property. Ultimately they came to be unsuccessful in the revision before the High Court. Thus, this appeal by special leave.

3.

The only question is whether the appellants have acquired any valid title to the property from Mohd. Marghoob Siddiqui, a citizen of Pakistan? On his acquiring citizenship of Pakistan, M.M. Siddiqui ceased to be a citizen of India and thereby after the demise of his mother, he had no right, title or interest in the land to obtain bhumidari right. The proceedings and patta are void.

4.

Under these circumstances, since the purchaser cannot have a better title than the seller himself had, the appellants could not acquire any title by virtue of sale effected by Mohd. Marghoob Siddiqui.

5.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.