High CourtsDivision Bench(1890) 09 MAD CK 0004

Sethu vs Krishna and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 September 1890 · Citation: (1891) ILR (Mad) 61

HON’BLE JUDGES
Best, J · Arthur J.H. Collins, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 125 words
1.

The lower Appellate Court''s judgment proceeds on the plaint alone, but the Judge appears to have lost sight of the fact that the property is

stated in the plaint to have been entrusted to first defendant for the benefit of plaintiff and his mother. If such is the case, the plaintiff''s suit will not

be barred, as Section 10 of the Limitation Act will apply [Sethu v. Subra-manya ILR 11 Mad. 274 and Suddasook Kootary v. Ram Chunder ILR

17 Cal. 620.

2.

The lower Court''s decree is set aside and '' the suit remanded for disposal on the evidence as to the portion which is the subject of this appeal.

3.

The costs hitherto incurred will be provided for in the revised decree.