High CourtsSingle Bench(1972) 10 P&H CK 0012

Seth Ganpat Ram Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factory vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 6 October 1972 · Citation: (1973) 31 STC 250

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.R. Sharma, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ No. 2826 of 1971

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 230 words

M.R. Sharma, J.—It is conceded by the learned counsel for the parties that this case is covered by a Bench decision of this court, The State of Punjab v. Aryavarta Industries [1972] 30 S.T.C. 200.

2.

I, therefore, quash the order dated 18th May, 1971, passed by the Assessing Authority and remand the case back to it for decision in accordance with law.

3.

A reading of the order passed by the Assessing Authority shows that it sat in judgment over a judgment delivered by a learned Judge of this court. This conduct on the part of the Assessing Authority tantamounts to gross violation of judicial discipline and amounts to contempt of court. No subordinate authority is allowed to say that a judgment delivered by the High Court is incorrect. Let the Assessing Authority know that such an Act if committed in future will be severely dealt with.

4.

I think these observations are enough to instill respect for binding precedents in the minds of the subordinate Tribunals and courts. After observing this, I feel no necessity of issuing notice for contempt of court against the Assessing Authority.

5.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Patiala, for circulation amongst the Assessing Authorities so that they may be more careful in future.

6.

The petition is allowed with no order as to costs.