High Courts(1898) 08 MAD CK 0016

Seshayya vs Subbamma

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 August 1898 · Citation: (1898) 8 MLJ 269

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 190 words
1.

We cannot agree with the District Judge in holding that Section 58 of the Indian Stamp Act precludes any evidence except a receipt being

adduced to prove payment. It only provides that a party making a payment may demand a receipt Even when a receipt is given and is not

produced in evidence, evidence aliunde is admissible as the Illustration to Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act to which the Judge refers clearly

shows. There is no conflict between that Illustration and Section 92 of the Act. The Judge was also in error in holding that the endorsement on

Exhibit I, was inadmissible for want of registration for the endorsement does not purport to extinguish the mortgage. (Section 17 Clause n of the

Indian Registration Act.)

2.

As the District Judge, in consequence of his erroneous views on these matters, has decided the case without reference to the .evidence bearing

on the question of payment, we must set aside his decree and remand the appeal for disposal in accordance with law. Costs in the second appeal

will be provided for in the revised decree of the District Judge.