High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 09 MAD CK 0016

Senthooran vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 September 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.V.Muralidaran
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
393 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 287 words
1.

The appellant filed this appeal to enlarge him in connection with the case in Crime No.77 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that on 01.07.2017 there was a wordy quarrel arose between the appellant and the de-facto complainant, the

appellant assaulted the de-facto complainant and abused him with filthy language. Further, the appellant abused and referred him to his caste name,

who belongs to Scheduled Caste Community. Pursuant to the above, the case has been registered in Crime No.77 of 2017 for offence under

Sections 294(b), 353, 355 and 506(i) IPC r/w 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1) (m) of SC/ST(POA) Act 2015.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the appellant is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the

FIR.

4.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that the appellant is arrayed as sole

accused in this case and he was arrested on 14.07.2017 and the investigation is still pending.

5.

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration of the appellant, this Court is inclined

to allow the appeal and grant bail to the appellant.

6.

Accordingly the Criminal appeal is allowed and the appellant is ordered to be enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The appellant shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to

the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge Cum Special Judge for P.C.R Cases, Ramanathapuram District.

(i) the appellant shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.