Tribunals and Commissions(2003) 05 NCDRC CK 0013

SENIOR POST MASTER, HEAD POST OFFICE vs FIRM MULLAD MAL RAM KARAN DAS

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 2 May 2003 · Citation: 2003 2 CPJ 688

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.D.Shahi , Surendra Kumar , Luxmi Singh J.
RESULT
Appeal dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 249 words
1.

THIS appeal has been filed against the order dated 27.1.1993 passed by District Forum, Dehradun.

2.

THE complainant purchased three N.S.Cs. for Rs. 2,500/-. After the issue became mature, the claimant prayed for interest. THE appellant refused interest because the N.S.Cs. have been issued illegally. It was alleged that the claimant was entitled to simple interest. THE learned Forum rejected the plea of the appellant. In this appeal, it was argued that the N.S.Cs. could not have been issued in the name of a Firm, therefore, its issue is illegal. THE N.S.Cs. have been issued in the name of "Ram Karan Das", Partner, M/s. Mullad Mal Ram Karan Das. THEse N.S.Cs. have been issued in the name of Karan Das who is a partner of the Firm, and not in the name of the Firm. Shri Ram Karan Das may have purchased it as partner for the benefit of the partnership but has not purchased in the name of the firm, but has purchased in his own name. THErefor, it cannot be argued that the sale of the certificate was illegal. Secondly also, the N.S.Cs. have been issued by the appellant himself. If the appellant sold it knowingly, it cannot say that it has sold it illegally. Nobody can take benefit of his own wrong. There is nothing in this appeal. The claim has rightly been allowed. ORDER This appeal is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. Cost of the appeal shall be easy. Appeal dismissed.