High CourtsSingle Bench(1989) 07 MAD CK 0004

Selvamani vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 July 1989 · Citation: (1989) 2 MLJ 506(1)

HON’BLE JUDGES
Janarthanam, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 268 words

Janarthanam, J.—This is an application filed u/s 482, Cr.P.C. to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner before the Judicial

Magistrate II, Kulithalai, pending disposal of CA. No. 158 of 1984.

2.

The petitioner was found guilty for an offence u/s 307 I.P.C. convicted thereunder, and sentenced to seven years R.I. by the learned Section

Judge, Trichy, in S.C. No. 128 of 1983. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, the petitioner filed appeal in CA. No. 158 of 1984 and Crl.

M.P. No. 1829 of 1984 to suspend the sentence and to release him on bail. This Court granted him absolute bail without attaching any conditions,

on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000 with two sureties each for like sum to the satisfaction of the J.S.C.M. Kulithalai.

3.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner now represents that notwithstanding the fact that no condition was imposed by this Court as regards the

appearance of the petitioner before any forum, the Judicial Magistrate II, Kulithalai, is insisting for the personal appearance of the petitioner

bimonthly. He also represents that if the petitioner failed to appear as insisted, the Magistrate would issue non-bailable warrant for arrest and

production of the petitioner before him.

4.

It is beyond one's comprehension as to how the Magistrate could insist on the appearance of the petitioner, far beyond the order of the High

Court. The insistence of the appearance of the petitioner does not appear to be warranted and if the Magistrate does so under any

misapprehension, it is high time that he desists from such practice. With this observation, this petition is dismissed.