High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 04 KAR CK 0039

S.Chetan @ Cylender vs State Of Karnataka

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 19 April 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Natarajan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No. 3017 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 489 words

K. Natarajan, J

1.

This petition is filed by petitioner/accused No.4 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., for granting bail in Crime No.217/2020 registered by Kumbalagudu

Police for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 504, 307, 324 read with Section 149 of IPC.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that one Deepak V., filed the complaint before the police and the police registered the case. During the course of

investigation, the petitioner was arrested on 18.03.2021. The complainant has stated that he is running a car wash garage and accused No.1 worked

with him 6 years back and later, he left the job and he came near car wash garage and asked him to provide drinks and water and there was a quarrel

in the Dhaba. Therefore, the police came and enquired accused No.1, on the background, this complainant gave information to the police suspecting

him that on 14.09.2020 at about 8.45 p.m., this petitioner along with six persons came in a motor bike and accused No.1 assaulted the complainant

with a long and other accused persons also assaulted with long and dragger, at the time, eyewitnesses - Lakshmana and Basava, garage person came

and the police also came near the spot. Immediately, the accused persons ran away from the spot. During the course of investigation, the police

arrested this petitioner and motor bike has been seized from him. The petitioner has approached the Sessions Court for grant of bail, which came to be

rejected. Hence, he is before this Court.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in the case.

His name is not found in FIR and he is in custody since more than 1 month. There is no overtact against him. Hence, prayed for allowing the bail

petition.

4.

Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader objected the bail petition.

5.

Upon hearing the arguments and on perusal of the records which goes to show that of course, the complaint came to be filed after sustaining

injuries. The complainant was saved because of arrival of police. Accused No.1 and others are friends who came to the shop of the complainant to

commit murder as he himself gave tips to the police when they quarrelled in Nisaraga Daba. The co-accused persons are still absconding and not yet

arrested by the police. There are two eyewitnesses to the alleged incident other than the injured person. The police have seized the motor bike from

the petitioner. The investigation is under progress. It is required to conduct the Test Identification Parade by the police for getting identification of this

petitioner from the injured and eyewitnesses. The co-accused persons are still absconding. Therefore, pending investigation, I am of the view that this

petitioner is not entitled for bail.

Accordingly, the bail petition filed by petitioner/accused No.4 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., is dismissed.