High CourtsSingle Bench(2014) 02 DEL CK 0279

SBL Pvt. Ltd. vs V.B. Shukla and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 February 2014 · Citation: (2014) 2 ILR 1407

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.S. Sistani, J.
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
CS(OS) No. 1782/2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 487 words

G.S. Sistani, J.

I.A. No. 2181/2014

1.

This is an application filed by defendant Nos. 2 to 4 seeking correction in the order dated 15.1.2014. Counsel for the parties submit that this Court had adjourned the matter for 3.2.2014, but inadvertently the date is mentioned as 3.4.2014.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The date of 3.4.2014 is cancelled.

CS(OS) 1782/2012

3.

With the consent of counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for hearing today. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent and mandatory injunction alongwith damages. The defendant No. 1 was employed with the plaintiff company. The defendant No. 1 resigned on 6.4.2012 and joined the defendant No. 2 company of which defendants No. 3 and 4 are the directors.

4.

The complaint of the plaintiff is that confidential and internal information was carried away by the defendant No. 1 to share the same with defendant No. 2, company. An ad interim ex-parte injunction was granted on 1.6.2012, when summons were issued in the suit.

5.

Counsel appearing for the defendant No. 1 on instructions, submits that defendant No. 1 has not used or passed any confidential information to defendants No. 2 to 4 nor shall he do so in future. Counsel for defendants No. 2 to 4 also submits that neither have they received any confidential information of the plaintiff company, nor do they have any intention either to instigate any of the employee of the plaintiff company to leave the employment of the plaintiff or to seek confidential information from them.

6.

In view of the stand taken by the parties and with the consent of the parties, the present suit is decreed on the following agreed terms:

"(i) A decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant No. 1 from, in any manner, directly or indirectly, disclosing any confidential information to the defendant Nos. 2, 3 or 4 as mentioned in Paragraph 29 or to any third person, in any manner whatsoever or using the said confidential information for his own personal or business purposes; and

(ii) The defendant No. 1 has not disclosed directly or indirectly any confidential information of plaintiff to defendants No. 2 to 4, nor shall he do so, except in the ordinary course of business.

(iii) Defendant Nos. 2 to 4 have neither received, nor instigate nor shall they instigate any employees of the plaintiff company to leave their employment.

(iv) The plaintiff gives up the relief of damages."

7.

Accordingly, the decree-sheet be drawn up, in above terms. The court appreciates the efforts put in by their counsel and the fair stand taken by the parties in resolving the matter. As the matter stands resolved before framing of issues, as prayed, the plaintiff is entitled to refund of the Court fees in terms of Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act.

8.

The suit stands disposed of.