High CourtsDivision Bench(1924) 03 MAD CK 0099

S.B. Varadarajulu vs Emperor

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 March 1924 · Citation: AIR 1925 Mad 183 : (1924) 20 LW 881

HON’BLE JUDGES
Venkatasubba Rao, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 82 words

Venkatasubba Rao, J.—The word "punishment" in Section 3 of the Whipping Act, has been interpreted as the "total of punishments awardable" by the learned Judges who decided Queen-Empress v. Dagadu (1892) 16 Bom. 357 In lieu of punishing the offender by sentencing him to imprisonment and imposing on him a fine, the Court may punish him with whipping. The portion of the sentence, imposing the fine, must, therefore, be set aside. I accordingly do so and direct that the fine be refunded.