High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 04 BOM CK 0014

Sayed Hassan Ismail And 58 Ors vs State Of Goa

Bombay High Court · Decided on 4 April 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. S. Sonak, J · R.N. Laddha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No.1730 Of 2021 (F)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 217 words
1.

Heard Mr. Vivek Rodrigues, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M. Salkar, learned Government Advocate, who appears for the respondents.

2.

Mr. Salkar, on instructions, submits that the case of all the petitioners is covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.668/2014 dated 26.04.2017. He further states that in terms of the said decision, relief can now be granted to all the petitioners in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b), which read as follows:

(a) Issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned Circular dated 02.12.2010 issued by the respondent no.3 and the recoveries effected from the petitioners in pursuance thereof vis a vis these petitioners;

(b) To direct fixation of the salary and pensionary benefits of the petitioners in the pay scale of Rs.9300-34000+Rs.4800 (G.P.) along with future benefits based on the revised pay scales.

3.

Mr. Salkar states that now there will be no question of recoveries from the petitioner based on circular dated 02.12.2010, which now stands set aside.

4.

We now direct that the benefits should be granted to all the petitioners within six months from today. The petition is accordingly disposed of without any order for costs.