Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 07 ITAT CK 2724

Savitri Devi vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 9 July 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 5761/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 200 words

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, [in short, the “Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s order dated 13.01.2026 having DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1084720422(1), involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2.

Heard both the parties. Case file perused.

3.

It transpires at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned departmental authorities had initiated the impugned reopening in the assessee’s case vide section 148 notice dated 24.03.2021 finally culminating the Assessing Officer’s assessment dated 07.03.2022 making additions of Rs. 16,68,100/- as upheld in the CIT(A)/NFAC’s lower appellate discussion.

3.

That being the case, this Tribunal having noticed that the impugned reopening itself is not sustainable in law since set into motion after a time period of 6 years from AY 2014-15 and not involving any addition of more than Rs. 50 lacs as prescribed in light of section 149(1)(b) of the Act and in light of Naresh Balchandrao Shinde vs. ITO (2023) 451 ITR 149 (Bom). Quashed in very terms.

4.

All other remaining pleadings between the parties stand rendered academic.

5.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.