High Courts(1902) 01 MAD CK 0014

Savarimuthu Pillai vs Alagiam Pillai and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 January 1902 · Citation: (1902) 12 MLJ 88

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 124 words
1.

On the preliminary objection we agree with tin; ruling of the Calcutta High Courts Jantoo v. Raja Canto Dusn ILR 8 C. 515 which does not appear to have been brought to the notice of the learned Judges who hoard Pydal Namhiar v. Kannun Nambiar 12 M.L.J. R. 87 in this Court, that Rs. 10 is the light fee.

2.

The Court fee payable on a memorandum of appeal (also plaint) in a matter arising u/s 77 of the Registration Act 111 of 1877 to enforce registration is a fixed fee of Rs. 10 under Article 17, Clause 12, Schedule IV of the Court Fees Act.

3.

[The remaining portion of the judgment is omitted as immaterial for the purposes of this report.]