High CourtsDivision Bench(1916) 01 CAL CK 0006

Satyendra Nath Dey vs The Secretary of State for India in Council

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 7 January 1916 · Citation: 37 Ind. Cas. 110

HON’BLE JUDGES
Imam, J · Herbert Holmwood, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 116 words
1.

The order of the District Judge appears to be in accordance with Section 56 of Act IV of 1912, the provisions of which are the same as Section 20 of Act XXXV of 1858 on which the learned Judge relies. The Land Acquisition Judge, therefore, has not jurisdiction to refuse to pay out the particular sum directed by the District Judge to be applied by the petitioner for the maintenance of the lunatic or his family. The Rule is, therefore, made absolute and the order complained of is set aside. There will be no order for costs as the Secretary of State leaves the matter in the hands of the Court and does not oppose.