High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 07 DEL CK 1001

Satya Prakash vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 20 July 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prathiba M. Singh, J · Vikas Mahajan, J
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 9676/2026 & CM APPL.45006/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 321 words

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2.

The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mr. Satya Prakash under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend from the vending site at J-9/36, Front of Electricity office, Rajouri garden Delhi, west (Delhi), 110027 (hereinafter, the vending site’).

3.

The Petitioner has been issued a Certificate of Vending (hereinafter, ‘CoV’) bearing URI No. 5068994 under the category of ‘Others’ for vending at West Zone, Ward-S-5.

4.

The case of the Petitioner is that he has been vending from the vending site on a Tri-cycle, in a mobile condition. However, he is being repeatedly interpreted and obstructed by the concerned officials of the Delhi Police and Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘MCD’).

5.

Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that since the Petitioner has a proper CoV, he ought not to be disturbed.

6.

Ld. Counsel for the MCD submits that the Petitioner has to be a mobile vendor, and it is possible that the Petitioner is vending in a No- Vending Zone.

7.

The Court has perused the photograph of the Petitioner’s vend. The same is extracted below:

8.

It is clear from the above photograph itself that the Petitioner is a mobile vendor.

9.

If there is any issue that the Petitioner is vending from a No-Vending Zone, the concerned Assistant Commissioner, MCD shall inform the Petitioner as to which is the area, which is not in the No-Vending Zone.

10.

In that case, the Petitioner shall not vend in the No- Vending Zone and the Petitioner shall abide by all the remaining terms and conditions of the CoV, subject to which his vend shall not be disturbed in any manner.

11.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Pending application, if any, are also disposed of.