Satya Pal Singh vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

It is alleged that the petitioner was employed with respondent No. 2 as a clerk and was given joining on 2.1.1987. He unfortunately all of sudden became a mentally disturbed person due to some family problems and he left his house in a state of unsound mind. It is stated that after about five years a neighbour of the petitioner had gone to Balaji for pilgrimage saw the petitioner there and informed about him to the wife of the petitioner incident. Thereafter the wife of the petitioner were gone to Balaji and had found the petitioner in a state of unsound mind. She then brought the petitioner to Shahadara Hospital and admitted him there for treatment.

After medical treatment, it is claimed that the petitioner became fully fit and thereafter getting medical certificate of discharge from District Hospital, Ghaziabad he moved an application to the respondent No. 2 on 8.5.2006 annexing therewith prayed for allowing him to join his duties.

It appears that petitioner was not permitted to join hence he filed writ petition before this Court, which was numbered as writ petition No. 62897 of 2006 by which the Court directed the respondent No. 2 to take a final decision in the matter pursuant to the letter dated 1.5.2006 in accordance with law within a period of two months. Respondent No. 2 thereafter rejected the claim of the petitioner vide order dated 13.2.2007 after enquiry into the matter.

Jh lR;iky flag iq= fnoaxr Jh fNn~nk flag xzke0 jtSgVh] iks0 flaHkkoyh ''kwcj fey ftyk xkft;kckn }kjk ek0 mPp U;k;ky;] bykgkckn es okn la[;k 62897@2006] lR;iky flag cuke m0iz0 ljdkj jkT; ,oa vU; uked fjV ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h ftles fuEu vfHkys[kks dks vk/kkj crk;k x;k A%

1& fnukad 13-4-2006 dks jkds''k ifRu lR;iky us {ksf=; lsok;kstu vf/kdkjh esjB dks Hkh lR;iky dks iqu% lsok esa ysus dk vuqjks/k fo"k;d ;w0ih0lh0 Mkd ls izsf"kr fd;k x;k A

2& fnukad 01-05-2006 dks Jh Mh0 ih0 flag {ksf=; lsok;kstu vf/kdkjh esjB }kjk eq[; fpfdRlkf/kdkjh baLVhV~;wV vkQ g;weSu fogSfo;j ,.M ,ykbM lkabl fny''kkn xkM+Zu fnYyh dks Hkh lR;iky flsg dh fQVusl izek.k i= iznku djus gsrq i= izsf"kr fd;k x;k A

3& fnukad 08-05-2006 dks Jh lR;iky flag fd }kjk {ks=h; lsok;kstu vf/kdkjh esjB e.M+y esjB dks dk;ZHkkj xzg.k djus gsrq vuqefr iznku djus ds fy, i= izsf"kr fd;k x;k A

4& fnukad 04-11-2006 dks iqu% Jh lR;iky flag }kjk {ksf=; lsok;kstu vf/kdkjh esjB e.My esjB dks dk;ZHkkj xzg.k djus dh vuqefr iznku djus gsrq Ik= izsf"kr fd;k x;k A

ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us Hkh lR;iky flag }kjk nk;j dh ;kfpdk ij {ksf=; lsok;kstu vf/kdkjh esjB dks funsZ''k fn;k fd fnukad 01-05-2006 dks dk;kZy; }kjk tkjh i= ds vk/kkj ij lEiw.kZ d`r dk;Zokgh ds vuqlkj fof/klEer~ vfUre fu.kZ; vkns''k izkfIr ds 2 ekg ds vUnj ys rFkk fu.kZ; ls oknh dks Hkh voxr djkos A

;kfpdk es nkf[ky mDr 4 i=ksa esa ls fnukad 08-05-2006 ,oa fnukad 4-11-2006 ds i= dk;ZHkkj xzg.k djus dh vuqefr iznku djus fo"k;d Fks A dk;Zky; izfdz;k esa dk;ZHkkj xzg.k dh dk;Zokgh dk;Zokgh deZpkjh ds Loa; dk;kZy; esa mifLFkr gksus ij dh tkrh gS A vr% mDr i= lafnX/k izrhr gq, ftldh tkap ds fy, tkap vf/kdkjh dks fu;qfDr djds tkap vk[;k izkIr dh x;h A

tkap vf/kdkjh dks tkap vk[;k ls ;g ckr izekf.kr gqbZ fd mDr dzekad 1 ij mfYyf[kr i= fnukad 13-4-2006 dk;Zky; ls izkIr ugha gqvk gS A tkap es Mk;jh jftLV~j ds vk/kkj ij ;g Li"V :Ik ls izekf.kr gks x;k fd fnukad 13-4-2006 dks dk;kZy; es dksbZ Hkh i= izkIr ugh gqvk Fkk A

dzekad 2 ij mfYyf[kr i= fnukad 01-05-2006 dks lEcU/k tkap vf/kdkjh us viuh tkap vk[;k esa ;g izekf.kr fd;k fd ;g i= dk;kZy; ls tkjh gh ugh fd;k x;k gS rFkk bl i= ij fd;s x;s gLrk{kj Hkh QthZ ,oa tkyh gS A mDr i= fnukad 01-05-2006 esa ftl fMLiSp la0 359 dk mYys[k fd;k x;k gS og fMLiSp jftLVj ds vuqlkj fnukad 30-1-2006 dk gS rFkk bl la[;k ij {ks=h; jkstxkj fodkl vf/kdkjh] xft;kckn dks i= izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS A tkap vf/kdkjh us bl i= dk QthZ tkyh rFkk dwVjfpr �QWczhdsVsM� ekuk gS A

mDr dzekad 3 ,oa 4 dze''k% 08-05-2006 ,oa 04-11-2006 ds i=ksa dk mYys[k gS] tks dk;ZHkkj xzg.k djus ds lEcU/k es gS A tkap vf/kdkjh dh tkap vk[;k ls ;g Li"V gqvk fd fnukad 08-05-2006 dk;Zky; es ek= 01 i= izkIr gqvk gS A tks ch0 ih0 b.Vj dkyst Hkjky esjB ls izkIr gqvk gS A mijksDr fLFkfr tkap vf/kdkjh dh xgu vk[;k }kjk izekf.kr gqbZ A

mijksDr Ik`"BHkwfe esa ;g Li"V gS fd fnukad 13-4-2006 dks lR;iky flag dh ifRu ds Lrj ls dk;kZy; dks dksbZ i= ugh izkIr gqvk A fnukad 01-05-2006 dks {ks=h; lsok;kstu vf/kdkjh esjB }kjk eq[; fpfdRlkf/kdkjh baLVbL;wV vkQ g;weSu fogSfo;j ,.M+ ,ykbM lkabl fny''kkn xkMZ+u ubZ fnYyh dks dksbZ i= izsf"kr ugh x;k rFkk bl i= ij fd;k x;k gLrk{kj QthZ ,oa tkyh gS A bl i= dh fMLiSp la0 359 fnukad 30-1-2006 dh gS A bl la[;k ij i= {ksf=;k jkstxkj fodkl vf/kdkjh xkft;kckn dks izsf"kr fd;k x;k gS A fnukad 8-5-2006 dks Hkh lR;iky flag }kjk izsf"kr dksbZ i= dk;kZy; dks izkIr ugh gqvk gS rFkk fnukad 04-11-2006 dks Hkh lR;iky flag ds Lrj ls izsf"kr fd;k gqvk dksbZ i= dk;kZy; dks izkIr ugh gqvk gS A oLrqr% fnukad 08-05-2006 rFkk fnukad 04-11-2006 dks rFkk dfFkr :Ik ls iszf"kr i= dk;ZHkkj xzg.k djus dh vuqefr fo"k;d gS A dk;ZHkkj xzg.k djus gsrq deZpkjh dks Lo;a mifLFkr gksuk gksrk gS A fdlh i=kpkj ls fdlh deZpkjh dks dk;ZHkkj xzg.k ugh djk;k tk ldrk gS A

oLrqr% ;kph Jh lR;iky flag us vlR; tkyh ,oa dwVjfpr �QSczhdsVsM� i=ks ds ek/;e ls ek0 mPp U;k;ky; esa vius LokFkZ dks flf) gsrq ;kfpdk nk;j dh gS] tks xSj dkuwuh Hkh gS A bu vlR; QthZ ,oa dwVjfpr i=ks ,oa mDr lEiw.kZ xSj dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ds vk/kkj ij fdlh Hkh izdkj dh fof/klEer~ dk;Zokgh djuk lEHko ugh gS A

Aggrieved by the order, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

It appears from the impugned order that the petitioner filed forged document as well as letters to form a basis for reinstatement. This Act of his raises a cloud on the authenticity of his explanation for running away from duty for five years. If a person can forge documents for supporting his case he can also concoct a story of being unsound mind missing for years. Such a person cannot be permitted to be reinstated in service in the facts and circumstances of this case. It is, therefore, not a case of interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.