High Courts(1992) 05 AHC CK 0053

Sattoo @ Satya Narayan vs State

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 1 May 1992

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surya Prasad, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 640 of 1992

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 170 words

Surya Prasad, J.—This is a criminal revision against the order dated 2.3.92. passed by Sri S.S. Gupta, learned Sessions Judge, Banda rejecting the revisionist's application to file fresh bail bonds and release him on bail in Session Trial No. 340 of 1991 under Section 307 I. P. C. State v. Sattoo alias Satya Narain.

2.

Heard the learned Counsel for the revisionist. The learned Counsel for the revisionist has argued that the revisionist had actually presented himself on 10.10.91 in the Court of Sessions Judge, but the case file to which this revision relates, was not received then in that court and therefore, the applicant revisionist was asked to present himself on the receipt of the file. But he was subsequently sent to jail without any fault of his. The ground mentioned in this memo of revision appears to be sufficient for this purpose. The revision is allowed. The learned Sessions Judge, Banda is directed to release the revisionist on his furnishing fresh bail bonds to his satisfaction. Revision allowed.