High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 02 P&H CK 0360

Satnam Singh vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 25 February 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 249 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 270 words

Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J.—A communication, received from Satnam Singh by the Registry of this Court on 25.1.2011, has been treated as a writ petition, wherein it is stated that on 22.1.2011 at about 12.00 Noon, five/six police officials came to the house of Petitioner and forcibly picked up his younger brother, namely Balwinder Singh along with gold and silver jewellery weighing five tolas.

2.

In response thereto, learned Counsel for the Respondent has filed a reply, by way of affidavit of Madan Lal, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Assandh, today in the Court. The same is taken on record. In the reply, it is stated that on 22.1.2011 Jai Narain, Assistant Sub Inspector, had apprehended Balwinder Singh alias Binda, brother of the Petitioner, at Gonder-Badnara Road and 800 grams of poppy husk as well as a country made pistol .315 bore along with four live cartridges were recovered from his possession. Therefore, a case FIR No. 31 dated 22.1.2011, was registered at Police Station Nissing, u/s 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), against Balwinder Singh. Another FIR No. 32 dated 22.1.2011, was also registered against Balwinder Singh at Police Station Nissing, u/s 25/54/59 of the Arms act, 1959. Thereafter, the alleged detenue was produced before the Illaqa Magistrate.

3.

In view of the reply filed by the state, it cannot be said that custody of alleged detenue Balwinder Singh was illegal. Therefore, no writ, in the nature of Habeas Corpus, can be issued. Hence, this Court cannot come to the rescue of the Petitioner and the present writ petition is dismissed.