High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 04 DEL CK 0121

SATISH KUMAR vs STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 April 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
CASE NUMBER
BAIL APPLN. 413 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 397 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 0003 of 2018 under Sections 498-A/304B of the IPC, Police Station Pahar Ganj, New Delhi.Â

2.FIR has been registered on complaint by the sister of the deceased. As per the complainant, the accused-petitioner and the deceased got married in

the year 2013 against the wishes of her family. It is contended that since the marriage was against the wishes of the family, the deceased, very

seldom, used to share instances with her parents. However, being the sister, she used to share some incidents with the complainant. It is alleged that

she was informed that the petitioner used to trouble the deceased and even beat her. At one instance, the deceased was badly beaten and the

deceased stayed with the complainant for a week. It is alleged that the deceased had informed her sister/complainant that she has even lodged a

complaint with the police and the police had taken the petitioner to the police station and even her neighbours used to inform her that the petitioner

used to create a ruckus and trouble her.Â

3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. He submits that there is nothing on record

to show that petitioner was ever called to police station on a complaint lodged by the deceased and as per his instructions there is no evidence that any

of the neighbours had stated that petitioner used to assault the deceased. He submits that the petitioner has been arrested solely on the basis of a legal

presumption and not on the basis of any evidence.Â

4.Without commenting upon the merits of the case, perusal of the record shows that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of regular bail.Â

The petitioner shall be released on bail, if not required in any other case, subject to petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with

one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

5.The petitioner shall not do anything, which shall either prejudice the investigation or any of the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall not make

any endeavour to contact the family of the deceased. The petitioner shall also not leave the country without the permission of the Trial Court.Â

6.Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.  Â