High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 UK CK 0152

Satish Giri vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No.1526 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 232 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

Heard Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the applicant and Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, Deputy Advocate

General with Mr. R.K. Joshi, Brief Holder for the State.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No. 190 of 2018, which has been registered under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC, at Police

Station Kankhal, District Haridwar.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 24.05.2018 and the applicant has not been named in the first information

report. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the first information report has been lodged after a period of seven days of the alleged

incident.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 24.05.2018, prima facie, the applicant has

been able to make out a case for bail at this stage. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned/Court concerned.

It is made clear that any observation made by this Court is only for the purpose of deciding the present bail application and the same shall not be taken

into consideration at all in any other proceedings.