High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 CHH CK 2499

Satish Dani vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur · Decided on 15 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WPC No. 1801 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 344 words
1.

The petitioner, in this Writ Petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“A. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue commanding and directing the respondents to produce before this Hon'ble Court all the relevant records pertaining to the case of the petitioners for its kind perusal.

B. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue to provide compensation to the petitioner for their acquired land or deliver the vacant possession of acquired land.

C. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue to decide the representation of the petitioner and in violation of principles of natural justice and the respondent authorities be directed to provide the compensation to the petitioners in respect of the land.

D. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case.

E. Cost of the petition may also be awarded.”

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file an appropriate application before the concerned authorities, i.e., the RDA, respondents No. 5 and 6.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 5 and 6/RDA has no objection if such a limited direction is issued.

4.

Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice would be served if the petitioner is permitted to file an appropriate application before the concerned authorities. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to file such an application before the concerned authorities (respondents No. 5 and 6), who shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present petition stands disposed of.