High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 06 MAD CK 0173

Sathiyamoorthy vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 27 June 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 11487 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 403 words

G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, J

1.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 427, 323, 324, 506(2) IPC and Section 4 of the Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No.137 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was some dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioner with regard to the raising dog. Therefore, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked him. Hence, the case.

3.Heard both sides and perused the materials available in the record.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 A.M., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.