High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 02 DEL CK 2100

Satender Singh vs State (NCT of Delhi)

Delhi High Court, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 3 February 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Jain, J
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(CRL) 270/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 183 words
1.

Petitioner seeks parole for a period of 30 days for the reason that his representation given to the Competent Authority has not been given any timely consideration.

2.

Learned Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State, however, submits that as per the information gathered from the Jail Authorities, the convict i.e. petitioner herein, has already been granted second spell of furlough for a period of two weeks by the Competent Authority vide order dated 06.01.2026 but till date such furlough has not even been availed by the petitioner.

3.

She has placed on record copy of the communication dated 02.02.2026 received from the Central Jail No.1 which is accompanied by copy of order of grant of furlough.

4.

The entire set has been supplied to learned counsel for petitioner.

5.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the above, at this moment, he does not pray for any further relief and would rather advise his W.P.(CRL) 270/2026 1 client to furnish the requisite bonds in terms of the furlough granted to him.

6.

The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.