High Courts(2007) 05 P&H CK 0108

Sat Pal vs Ravi Sher Singh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 May 2007 · Citation: (2007) 4 RCR(Civil) 140

HON’BLE JUDGES
Permod Kohli, J
CASE NUMBER
CM No.6743-CII of 2007 and FAO No.1394 of 2007

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 211 words

Permod Kohli, J. (Oral)

1.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of two days in filing the appeal, is condoned.

2.

This appeal is directed against the award dated 28.10.2006 passed by the learned M.A.C.T., Ambala. The appellant suffered multiple simple and grievous injuries including the fracture of left leg. It is alleged that the appellant was working as a labourer and earning Rs.3250/ per month. The Tribunal, on the basis of the bills produced, granted Rs.20,000/ for medical treatment, a sum of Rs.60,000/ for 30% disability, which was assessed by the Doctor. Besides the above amounts, Rs.20,000/ was granted for pain and suffering, rich diet etc. In total, a sum of Rs.100,000/ has been awarded with interest at the rate of 7.5 per cent per annum from the date of the filing of the petition till its realisation.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the medical expenses are much more than the amount awarded to the appellant/claimant. However, all the bills could not be produced.

I have perused the award impugned in the present appeal and heard the learned counsel for the appellant at length.

In my considered view, the award passed by the learned Tribunal, is absolutely reasonable. No interference is warranted. Appeal is dismissed.