High CourtsSingle Bench(2014) 08 CAL CK 0021

Saswati Ray vs Riya Roy (Kar)

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 28 August 2014 · Citation: (2015) 2 CHN 273

HON’BLE JUDGES
Joymalya Bagchi, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
C.R.R. No. 2945 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 247 words

Joymalya Bagchi, J.

1.

The petitioner is a respondent in a proceeding initiated by the opposite party No. 1 under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. She is admittedly the mother in law of the opposite party No. 1. It is claimed that no relief has been sought for against her in the said proceeding. It is further claimed that it is difficult for her (the petitioner herein) to attend the proceeding pending before the learned 5th Judicial Magistrate at Asansol, Burdwan. I have perused the materials on record. I find that the allegations of domestic violence occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Judicial Magistrate and he has the jurisdiction to entertain and try the proceeding. Inconvenience of the parties to attend the proceeding by itself is not a ground of transfer. The petitioner is entitled to make appropriate application before the concerned Court to seek permission to be represented by her learned lawyer. If such application is made, the learned Magistrate shall consider the same in accordance with law bearing in mind that the petitioner is a permanent resident of Delhi and the fact that the identity of the petitioner is not challenged in the instant proceeding. I however, do not find any reason to transfer the instant proceeding, as prayed for.

2.

With the aforesaid observations, the revisional application is disposed of. Copy of the order be sent down to the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate.