High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 09 P&H CK 0130

Saroj Rani and another vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 20 September 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mehinder Singh Sullar, J
CASE NUMBER
CRM No. M-28840 of 2012 (O and M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 164 words

Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.—The petitioners claiming themselves to be major, pleaded that they have performed their love marriage against the wishes of the parents and other relatives. They apprehend danger to their lives and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 9. Heard.

2.

Issue notice of motion.

3.

At this stage, Mr. Raj Preet Singh Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notices on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

4.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record with their valuable help and without commenting/expressing any opinion, in regard to the ages of the parties and the validity of their marriage, the instant petition is partly accepted. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are directed to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners, in accordance with law. At the same time, respondent Nos. 4 to 9 are restrained from illegally interfering in the peaceful living/lives of the petitioners. Copy of the order be given dasti.