High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 01 OHC CK 0136

Saroj Kumar Sahoo vs Union Bank Of India & Another �. Opposite Parties M

Orissa High Court · Decided on 20 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jaswant Singh, J · M.S. Sahoo, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 661 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 343 words
1.

This matter is taken up through Virtual Mode.

2.

The petitioner is a defaulting borrower of a term loan for an amount of Rs.14,50,000/- raised from the Corporation Bank, Talcher Branch (now

merged with the Union Bank of India) on 29.12.2015. Due to lack of financial discipline, the loan account was declared as NPA on 29.04.2017, the

recovery process under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 was initiated by issuance of a Demand Notice under Section 13 (2) on 15.05.2017 which has, over

the period of time culminated into putting the mortgaged property (offered as a collateral security) to auction on 20.01.2022.

3.

The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the e-auction notice for the sale fixed today on the ground of arbitrary charging of certain

amounts towards outstanding amount.

4.

Learned counsel for the Bank states that a S.A. No.70 of 2021 already stands filed by the petitioner-defaulting borrower before the Debts

Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack and a similar relief as claimed in the present petition stands already declined by the DRT. He further states that this Court

had passed an order on 19.01.2022 providing an opportunity to the petitioner to protect his property being put to sale by deposit of a sum of Rs.10

lakhs till today. Concededly the said amount has not been deposited.

5.

In view of the aforesaid factual contention that an application by the petitioner-borrower already stands filed before the DRT and the petitioner

having not complied with the directions passed by this Court on 19.01.2022, we find no ground to invoke our writ jurisdiction. The writ petition is

accordingly dismissed.

6.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order

available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated

vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

...............................................