High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 07 DEL CK 0227

Saroj Bhujel & Ors @APPELLANT@Hash State (Nct Of Delhi)& Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 July 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 2098 OF 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 409 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

The petitioners (i) Saroj Bhujel, (ii) Laxman Bhujel and (iii) Ram Bhadhur Bhujel seek quashing of FIR No.285/2017 under Sections

323/354/354B/509/34 IPC, Police Station Kotla Mubarakpur. Â

2.

Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that had taken place on a trivial issue. It is pointed out that during investigation, apart from the

petitioners, involvement of one Tek Bahadur was also found. Chargesheet has been filed against all of them. Â

3.

Learned APP for the State, under instructions from the Investigating Officer, submits that Tek Bahadur is not traceable and is not appearing before

the Trial Court. He submits that proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. have been initiated against him.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions from the petitioners, submits that the petitioners are not aware as to who this Tek Bahadur is

and have made an attempt but have not been able to trace out his whereabouts. They pray that the FIR be quashed qua the petitioners only.

5.

Learned counsel for the parties submit petitioners as well as respondent Nos.2 to 4 are known to each other as they belong to the same community.

With the intervention of the respectable members of the society as well as common friends, they have settled their disputes and a Compromise Deed

dated 23.02.2018 has been executed. Â

6.

Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4 are present in Court in person and identified by the Investigating Officer. They have filed their supporting affidavits as

well as their identify proofs. They submit that they do not wish to press their complaint any further. Â

7.

In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 do not wish to press their complaint, continuation of

criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is

restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings

emanating therefrom.

8.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. The subject FIR No.285/2017 under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 IPC, Police Station Kotla

Mubarakpur as well as the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners. This would be without prejudice to the

proceedings initiated against Tek Bahadur.

9.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.