High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 03 CHH CK 0235

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 22 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. SAM KOSHY
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WPS No. 2515 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 339 words
1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order of termination dated 27/02/2018. Vide the said impugned order, the services of the

petitioner has been terminated.

2.

The counsel for the petitioner assailing the impugned order on the ground that, a mercy appeal preferred by the petitioner to his excellency the

Governor of the State is pending consideration and till the mercy appeal is decided by his excellency the Governor, the petitioner may not be

terminated from the employment.

3.

This Court does not find any strong case made out by the counsel for the petitioner for the simple reason that, admittedly, the petitioner in the instant

case was prosecuted for the offence punishable under Sections 279, 337 & 304-A of IPC and he was further convicted for the offence under Section

304-A of IPC vide order dated 09/12/2000 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bywahari, Shahdol. The said order of conviction

further has been affirmed in a criminal appeal vide judgment dated 20/06/2001 and also by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in a revision decided on

23/10/2007.

4.

These three judgments were further subjected to challenge before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in an S.L.P. preferred by the petitioner which also

stood dismissed on 16/04/2008.

5.

Given the aforesaid factual matrix of the case, the petitioner as on date stands convicted for offence under Section 304-A of IPC.

6.

In view of the fact that the petitioner stands convicted, there would be the automatic disqualification for the petitioner to hold the post in

Government employment.

7.

Under the circumstances this Court does not find any merits in the present Writ Petition and the same therefore deserve to be and is accordingly

dismissed.

8.

Needless to mention that since the petitioner has preferred a mercy appeal to his excellency the Governor, in the event if there is setting aside of

the order passed by the Governor, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his claim.

9.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off.