High CourtsSingle Bench(2006) 03 DEL CK 0164

Santosh Kumar Jain vs Shrimandir Das Jain and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 2 March 2006 · Citation: (2006) 128 DLT 116

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.S. Sodhi, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
CM (M) 2168 of 2005 and CM Application 13347 of 2005

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 242 words

R.S. Sodhi, J

1.

This petition seeks to challenge the order of the Civil Judge, Delhi dated 27.7.2005, whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the application of the petitioner herein u/s 151 CPC challenging the compromise arrived between the parties on 27.3.2004 and imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000/- on the petitioner to be paid to plaintiff No.1 as also to earlier counsel for defendants, Mr. R.N.Oberoi, in equal sums, that is, Rs.5000/- each.

2.

Petitioner is primarily aggrieved of the costs that have been imposed on him. He submits that plaintiff No.1 was served on the day when the arguments were heard and the order pronounced. Therefore, according to him, he is not entitled to costs. He further submits that the learned Judge went wrong in awarding cost to earlier counsel for the defendant, Mr. R.N.Oberoi, when he is not a party to the proceedings.

3.

Heard petitioner in person. No doubt awarding of cost is a discretion given to the Court u/s 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure, however, the same is not to be exercised arbitrarily. The Court went wrong in awarding Rs. 5000/- to earlier counsel for defendant, Mr. R.N.Oberoi, who is not a party to the proceedings. I accordingly modify the order under challenge to the extent that no costs are payable to Shri R.N.Oberoi, the earlier counsel for the defendant.

4.

With this modification, CM(M) 2168/2005 stands disposed of. CM APPL.13347/2005 also stands disposed of.