High CourtsDivision Bench(1909) 03 MAD CK 0006

Sannasi Ambalagarau and Another vs Venkatapathy Chetty and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 March 1909 · Citation: 2 Ind. Cas. 420

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sankaran Nair, J · Ralph Benson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 92 words
1.

The Judge holds that if the plaintiffs had sued for a declaration of title and for an injunction, then the suit would be maintainable, but as the suit is

only for an injunction he holds that it will not lie. But the prayer for an injunction necessarily involves a declaration of title where the title is denied.

The decree of the Judge cannot be uphold. We set it aside, direct him to restore the appeal to his file and dispose of it in accordance with law.

Costs will abide the event.