High CourtsDivision Bench(1888) 01 CAL CK 0002

Sankarmani Debya and Others vs Mathura Dhupini

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 20 January 1888 · Citation: (1888) ILR (Cal) 327

HON’BLE JUDGES
Norris, J · Beverley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 82 words
1.

We are of opinion that the "Judicial Officer as aforesaid" mentioned in the proviso to Section 153 of the Bengal Tenancy Act has reference to the "Judicial Officer" spoken of in Clause (b) of the section and to such an officer only. It follows that the District Judge possesses no revisional jurisdiction by virtue of that proviso in respect of the decrees and orders of a District Judge, Additional Judge or Subordinate Judge referred to in clause (a) of the section.