High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 06 UK CK 0052

Sanjeev Mehta vs Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 19 June 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 485 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 234 words

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. (ORAL)

Petitioner had admittedly taken a commercial loan from the Punjab National Bank which he could not repay. Subsequently, the bank initiated the

recovery proceedings under the U.P. Public Money (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 to recover the outstanding loan amount as arrears of land revenue

and on 30.11.2016, a recovery citation has been issued against the petitioner for recovery of Rs. 5,59,797/-(rupees five lakhs fifty nine thousand seven

hundred ninety seven only).

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that if some reasonable time is granted, the petitioner shall pay the entire outstanding amount to the

bank in installments. Learned counsel for the respondent bank submitted that the bank is willing to take the remaining outstanding amount in

installments.

With the consent of both parties, the matter stands disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall pay rupees fifty thousand to the respondent

bank on or before 04.7.2018 and thereafter he shall pay the remaining outstanding amount in equal monthly installments spread over a period of two

years or in such installments which is mutually agreed by both the parties. It is directed that the last installment shall also carry cumulative interest. It

is made clear that recovery shall not include recovery charges. It is further made clear that in default of payment of any single installment, the bank

shall be at liberty to initiate fresh process of recovery.