Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 02 NCLAT CK 3546

Sanjeev Mahajan vs India Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) & Anr.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 3 February 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson · Barun Mitra, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
I.A. No. 259 of 2023 in Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 03 of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 316 words

O R D E R

This Interlocutory Application has been filed by the Appellant in disposed of Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 03 of 2022 which was disposed of by this Tribunal’s Judgment dated 04.07.2022. Subsequently, another order was passed by this Tribunal on 21.11.2022 in I.A. No. 3410 of 2022 filed by the Appellant. The Applicant/Appellant has come up with in this Application claiming that the Applicant/Appellant was not given opportunity to meet the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, who is the Competent Authority for considering the proposal of the Applicant/Appellant who is an MSME. By our order 21.11.2022, we have already made necessary clarification with regard to earlier judgment dated 04.07.2022.

Learned Counsel for the Bank submits that in accordance with the order passed by this Tribunal dated 04.07.2022 and 21.11.2022, all steps were taken by CoC. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that after 20.01.2023, the Applicant/Appellant has also made efforts to meet the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, but he was unsuccessful. Learned Counsel for Bank submits that CoC has already approved the Resolution Plan during the pendency of this Application

We are of the view that it is open for the Applicant/Appellant to make such application, as permissible in law, before the Adjudicating Authority for consideration of this grievance, if any. Learned Counsel for the Applicant/Appellant submits that he is making offer higher than the Successful Resolution Applicant, whose plan has been approved. It is open for the Applicant to place his plea, as admissible in law, before the Adjudicating Authority.

We are of the view that no case has been made out to make further order in I.A. No. 259 of 2023. Any Application filed by the Applicant shall be considered in accordance with law by the Adjudicating Authority.

Contempt Case (AT) No. 07 of 2023

Learned Counsel for the Applicant/Appellant submits that he does not want to prosecute the Contempt Application. Contempt Application is, therefore, closed.