High Courts(1909) 12 MAD CK 0006

Sangila vs Maruthamuthu aud Ors.

Madras High Court · Decided on 1 December 1909 · Citation: (1910) 20 MLJ 131

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 106 words
1.

This is a lease for a term of 12 months only and u/s 111, Transfer of Property Act, was determined at the expiry of the term. I"", is not suggested

that the tenancy was renewed u/s 116 of the Act; and we think the suit is barred under Article 139 of the 2nd schedule of the Limitation Act of

1877. The case to which the District Judge refers was a case of tenancy from year to year determinable by notice.

2.

We reverse the decree of the District Judge and restore that of the District Munsif with costs in this and the lower appellate Court.