Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 06 ITAT CK 2114

Sandeep Kumar vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "F", New Delhi · Decided on 25 June 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member · Vimal Kumar, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 3885/Del/2026, A.Y. 2012-13

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 338 words

PER VIMAL KUMAR, JM:

The appeal filed by the assessee against order dated 02.01.2026 under section 144 r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the CIT(A)”] arising out of assessment order dated 09.12.2019 for assessment year 2012-13.

2.

Ld. Authorized Representative for appellant/assessee submitted that Ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing application for condonation of delay of 2137 days in filing appeal due to non-receipt of order, illiteracy/ lack of awareness of faceless proceedings / impugned order, email communication issues, mis-communication with previous consultant and financial hardship.

3.

Ld. Authorized Representative for appellant/assessee submitted that Ld. Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 142(1) of the Act on 30.07.2019, 19.08.2019, 04.11.2019, there was no compliance. Ld. AO passed ex parte order dated 09.12.2019 in violation of principle of natural justice.

4.

Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that appellant/assessee had failed to respond various notices.

5.

From examination of record in light of aforesaid rival contention, it is crystal clear that Ld. AO had passed ex parte order dated 09.12.2019 u/s 144/147 of the Act in violation of principle of natural justice dismissed application for condonation of delay of 2137 days in filing appeal. The assessee had pleaded that due to non-receipt of order, illiteracy/ lack of awareness of faceless proceeding/ impugned order, email communication issues, mis-communication with previous consultant and financial hardships the delay occurred. The explanation for condonation of delay does not smack of malafide as appellant has not gained anything, therefore, delay of 2137 days in filing appeal is condoned.

6.

In view of above material facts, in interest of justice, impugned orders dated 02.01.2026 is set aside, the application for condonation of delay 2137 days is allowed and the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for afresh adjudication in accordance with law after affording fair opportunity of hearing to the appellant/assessee.

7.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.