High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 11 DEL CK 0265

Sandeep Gupta vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 26 November 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 1022 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 330 words

Crl.M.A.47988/2018 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.REV.P.1022/2018 & CRL.M.B.1817/2018

1.

Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and Mr. Sita Ram Khandelwal, Authorised representative.

2.

Petitioner impugns judgment dated 01.11.2018, whereby, the Appellate Court has rejected the appeal of the petitioner impugning order on conviction

dated 06.08.2018 and order on sentence dated 30.08.2018 whereby petitioner has been held guilty of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act. Subject cheque is of Rs.1,17,000/-.

3.

Petitioner was sentenced to undergo SI for a period of 3 months and to pay fine of Rs.1,52,000/-. Trial Court noticed that Rs.17,000/-has already

been paid. In default of payment of compensation, petitioner has to further undergo 30 days of imprisonment.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the authorised representative, Mr.Sita Ram Khandelwal submit that parties have settled their disputes

and petitioner has agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in full and final settlement of all the claims of the respondent/complainant. A sum of

Rs.50,000/- has already been paid today to Mr.Sita Ram Khandelwal. Balance amount of Rs.50,000/- is to be paid within a period of six months. The

authorised representative submits that he has no objection to the compounding of the subject offence on receipt of the settlement amount.

5.

Parties are directed to file an affidavit along with the Settlement terms.

6.

Petitioner shall also deposit costs equivalent to 15% of the cheque amount with Delhi State Legal Services Authority in terms of the judgment of the

Supreme Court in Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayyad Babulal: (2010) 5 SCC 663.

7.

Keeping in view the settlement, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of

the Trial Court, remaining sentence of the petitioner shall remain suspended till the next date of hearing.

8.

List on 01.05.2019.

9.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.