High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 08 CHH CK 0209

Sandeep Bansal vs Sunil Kumar Panda And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 21 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (227) No. 470 Of 2018 & Writ Petition (227) No. 702 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 213 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 04.05.2018 (Annexure - P/1) passed by the learned Claims Tribunal whereby the petitioner has

been impleaded as party / non-applicant in the claim petition.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is a person dealing with the sale and purchase of second hand vehicle and the

offending vehicle is in the name of respondent No. 2 who is the registered owner of the said vehicle. To butress his submissions, learned counsel for

the petitioner has relied upon the decision rendered by Supreme Court in the case of Naveen Kumar v. Vijay Kumar and Others(2018) 3 SCC 1.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

4.

Since, the petitioner has been impleaded as party / non-applicant in the claim petition, he would be at liberty to file reply and claim deletion of his

name stating he is not necessary party and that he is not liable for any compensation. In such an event of filing of reply by the petitioner, the Claims

Tribunal shall do well to consider and decide the petitioner's objection strictly in accordance with law.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).