High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 07 MAD CK 0076

Samuel, N.J.David vs State Of Tamil Nadu Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 July 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. G. Jayachandran, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 21511 Of 2019, WMP. No. 20715 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 502 words

Dr. G. Jayachandran, J

1.

Heard Mr.Ravi Kumar Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Inbanathan, learned Additional Government Pleader for the 1st respondent, Mr.Abdul Saleem, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and Ms.Geethi Ara for S.Ramasubramanian, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent.

2.

The daughter of the petitioner participated in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) examination 2019 and was allotted MBBS in Velammal Medical College in Anuppanadi, Velammal Village, Madurai, under Government Quota. Later she got a seat in Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore/3rd respondent and she was supposed to join that college on or before 19.07.2019. So in order to join the third respondent institute, she left Madurai on 15.07.2019 to Vellore. While travelling, she met with an accident and was admitted in the Kauvery Medical Hospital, Trichy and undergone surgery on 16.07.2019 and totally immobilised.

3.

The case of the petitioner is that his daughter being confined in hospital as inpatient, she is not able to report before the 3rd respondent personally today i.e.19.07.2019, being the last date for joining the institute.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already paid necessary fees to the third respondent and petitioner is at Vellore in the 3rd respondent campus with all the educational certificates of his daughter. Except the physical presence of his daughter, all other necessary formalities have been completed for joining the 3rd respondent institute, but if the 3rd respondent refuses to record her admission the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and she will loss the opportunity of joining Medical Course in CMC, Vellore.

5.

As far as the 3rd respondent is concerned, the counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent would submit that since the 2nd respondent has fixed 19.07.2019 as the last date for joining, if the student does not come and

report in person, the seat will be carried forward to the second round of counselling. Medical/physical examination of the candidate is pre-requisite to admit the student.

6.

The learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent would submit that considering the peculiar facts involved in this case, they have no objection for the 3rd respondent recording the admission of the petitioner's daughter herein without her physical presence.

7.

In the light of the above fact, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to record the admission of the petitioner's daughter in their Institute for MBBS Course for the year 2019. The presence of her father and production of the educational certificates by her father shall be deemed to be the presence of the candidate and as soon as the candidate recovers shall report to the Institute, subject herself to medical fitness test, if any, and pursue her course. The 2nd respondent shall condone the non-appearance of the petitioner's daughter today before the 3rd respondent, being the last date of admission and recognize her admission in the 3rd respondent college.

8.

With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.