High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 08 CHH CK 0057

Samman Padwar vs Union Of India And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 1 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ · Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 129 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 179 words

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ

1.

Writ petition of the appellant was dismissed by the learned Single Judge when he raised a grievance against his disengagement or removal from the

post of Manager/Expert (Skill & Livelihood).

2.

The learned Single Judge held that since the appellant was an appointee of a private company, who was hired by the said private company on

contract basis for a period of one year, the disengagement of the appellant cannot be said to be a case, which is required to be entertained under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the private company is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction in relation to the dispute.

3.

The learned Single Judge, however, has given liberty to the appellant to take recourse to law otherwise.

4.

Having examined Annexure - P/3, annexed with the writ petition, which is a letter of appointment, we are satisfied that the learned Single Judge has

committed no error in law.

5.

In the result, the writ appeal, being devoid of merit, is liable to be and is hereby dismissed.