High CourtsDivision Bench(1912) 03 CAL CK 0011

Salima Saidatannessa Bibi vs Enatulla Talukdar

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 26 March 1912 · Citation: 15 Ind. Cas. 524

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, C.J · N. Chatterjea, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 147 words
1.

It appears to us that we must follow the decision in Girish Chandra Chowdhry v. Kedar Chandra Roy 27 C. 473, for we are unable to perceive how it can be said that this case has been overruled by any subsequent decision of a Full Bench. On this basis, we must grant the plaintiff the relief to which she is entitled, that is, joint possession to the extent of 7 annas with the other co-sharers, that is, the principal defendants and the pro-forma defendants. We do not think that in the circumstances of the case, it is necessary to consider any further or incidental relief.

2.

The appellant must have her costs in the High Court and in the lower Courts from the respondents, in proportion to her success, that is to say, on the basis of Its. 60 the market-value of the 7 annas share.