High CourtsSingle Bench(2001) 03 P&H CK 0028

Salim vs Jaswant Kaur

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 13 March 2001 · Citation: (2001) 4 RCR(Civil) 638

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.S. Aggarwal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal from Order No. 318 of 1986

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 200 words

V.S. Aggarwal, J.—The short question agitated in the present appeal, directed against the award of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangrur dated 7.1.1986 is as to if the liability of the Insurance Company (National Insurance Company) would be to he extent of Rs. 1,50,000/- or would confine to Rs. 50,000/-. The learned Tribunal allowed the compensation to the tune of Rs. 76,800/- but limited the liability of the respondent-Insurance Company to the tune of Rs. 50,000/- keeping in view the provisions of Section 95(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2.

The sole argument raised is that inadvertently the earned Tribunal did not notice the amendment effected in the Motor Vehicles Act w.e.f. 31.8.1982 vide Motor Vehicles Act, 1982.

3.

This fact has not been disputed at the bar. Once it is so, the Insurance Company would be liable to pay the compensation of Rs. 76,800/- awarded by the Tribunal. To that extent the award is modified.

4.

As a necessary consequence, the appeal is allowed and it is directed that the Insurance Company would be liable to pay the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, referred to above with no other modification in the award.

5.

Appeal allowed.