High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 01 MAD CK 0054

Sakthi vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 January 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 716 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 537 words

T.V.Thamilselvi, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.12.2022 for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(A) and 4(1)(aaa) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Crime No.205 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of prosecution is that while the respondent police on a patrol duty, the petitioner was said to have found in possession of 33 litres of I.D. Arrack without any valid license and the same was seized by them. Hence, the complaint was registered against the petitioner.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that he is no way connected with the offence and he has not committed any of offence as alleged by the respondent police. He would also submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case and he will abide by any condition that may be imposed by this court. He would also submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for more than 11 days from 30.12.2022. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for respondent would submit that one previous case similar in nature pending against the petitioner and he is the sole accused. He would also submit that if he is released on bail, he would hamper the investigation and tamper the witnesses and the investigation is almost completed. However, he would vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances and also the fact that the investigation is almost completed, and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) as non-refundable deposit to the credit of Society for the Educational and Economic Development (SEED) Reg., Sriperumbudur, Account Name : SEED, A/C/No.2926101000002, Canara Bank, Sriperumbudur, IFSC CNRB0002926 (Cell No.99448 12053) and on such deposit, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing separate bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarapuram, Kallakurichi Dt., and on further conditions that::

(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for the period of two months.

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.